Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019

McIntosh v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, Local Union 118

McIntosh v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, Local Union 118
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 26, 2019
2019 NY Slip Op 3181
McIntosh v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, Local Union 118

Opinion

McIntosh v International Bhd. of Teamsters, Local Union 118 (2019 NY Slip Op 03181)
McIntosh v International Bhd. of Teamsters, Local Union 118
2019 NY Slip Op 03181
Decided on April 26, 2019
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 26, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

323 CA 18-00907

[*1]KEVIN MCINTOSH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION 118, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.




TREVETT CRISTO, P.C., ROCHESTER (MICHAEL T. HARREN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

KAVINOKY COOK LLP, BUFFALO (R. SCOTT DELUCA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered March 20, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted in part the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the second ordering paragraph and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action for, inter alia, breach of contract arising from defendant's failure to provide him with certain benefits, including post-retirement health insurance benefits and accrued vacation pay. Defendant appeals from those parts of an order granting plaintiff's motion insofar as it sought summary judgment on his first and second causes of action. During oral argument of this appeal, plaintiff correctly conceded that Supreme Court's second ordering paragraph regarding the measure of damages should be vacated as premature. We modify the order accordingly and otherwise affirm.

Entered: April 26, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.