Angelhow v. Chahfe
Angelhow v. Chahfe
2019 NY Slip Op 5438
Opinion
Angelhow v Chahfe (2019 NY Slip Op 05438)
Decided on July 5, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
86 CA 18-00572
| Angelhow v Chahfe |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 05438 |
| Decided on July 5, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 5, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
86 CA 18-00572
[*1]JAMIE ANGELHOW, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
FAYEZ CHAHFE, M.D., CHAHFE MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL RECRUITMENT, LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS THE CHAHFE CENTER, AND ST. ELIZABETH MEDICAL CENTER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
v
FAYEZ CHAHFE, M.D., CHAHFE MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL RECRUITMENT, LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS THE CHAHFE CENTER, AND ST. ELIZABETH MEDICAL CENTER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (EDWARD J. SMITH, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
DARREN JAY EPSTEIN, ESQ., P.C., NEW CITY (DARREN J. EPSTEIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Gregory R. Gilbert, J.), entered March 8, 2018. The order denied defendants' motion for leave to reargue and/or renew their motion for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Angelhow v Chahfe ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [July 5, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).
Entered: July 5, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.