Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse
Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse
2019 NY Slip Op 5884
Opinion
Vassenelli v City of Syracuse (2019 NY Slip Op 05884)
Decided on July 31, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
447 CA 18-01083
| Vassenelli v City of Syracuse |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 05884 |
| Decided on July 31, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 31, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
447 CA 18-01083
[*1]NICHOLAS L. VASSENELLI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
CITY OF SYRACUSE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, PMA MANAGEMENT CORP. AND CAROL WAHL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 7.)
v
CITY OF SYRACUSE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, PMA MANAGEMENT CORP. AND CAROL WAHL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 7.)
BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
SMITH MAZURE DIRECTOR WILKINS YOUNG & YAGERMAN, P.C., NEW YORK CITY (DANIEL Y. SOHNEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Gregory R. Gilbert, J.), entered February 20, 2018. The order granted the motion of defendants PMA Management Corp. and Carol Wahl for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy , 140 AD2d 988, 988 [4th Dept 1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts , 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1st Dept 1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Entered: July 31, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.