Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse
Vassenelli v. City of Syracuse
2019 NY Slip Op 5881
Opinion
Vassenelli v City of Syracuse (2019 NY Slip Op 05881)
Decided on July 31, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
444 CA 18-01074
| Vassenelli v City of Syracuse |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 05881 |
| Decided on July 31, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 31, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
444 CA 18-01074
[*1]NICHOLAS L. VASSENELLI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
CITY OF SYRACUSE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, PMA MANAGEMENT CORP. AND CAROL WAHL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 4.)
v
CITY OF SYRACUSE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, PMA MANAGEMENT CORP. AND CAROL WAHL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 4.)
BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
SMITH MAZURE DIRECTOR WILKINS YOUNG & YAGERMAN, P.C., NEW YORK CITY (DANIEL Y. SOHNEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Gregory R. Gilbert, J.), entered February 28, 2018. The judgment dismissed the amended complaint against defendants PMA Management Corp. and Carol Wahl.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Vassenelli v City of Syracuse ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [July 31, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).
Entered: July 31, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.