Wentworth v. Atwell
Opinion
| Wentworth v Atwell |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 09217 |
| Decided on December 20, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on December 20, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
1279 CA 19-00710
v
JANICE M. ATWELL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
JANICE M. ATWELL, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
ROBERT FEURY AND SANDRA L. FEURY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
LONGSTREET & BERRY, LLP, FAYETTEVILLE (MICHAEL J. LONGSTREET OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
FELT EVANS, LLP, CLINTON (ANTHONY G. HALLAK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE F. ANEY, HERKIMER (FRANK L. MADIA OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Charles C. Merrell, J.), dated October 5, 2018. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for leave to amend the answer to add a counterclaim.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: December 20, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.