People v. Dayshawn V.
People v. Dayshawn V.
113 N.Y.S.3d 881; 179 A.D.3d 847; 2020 NY Slip Op 311
(New York Supplement, Third Series)
Opinion
People v Dayshawn V. (2020 NY Slip Op 00311)
Decided on January 15, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
BETSY BARROS
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
2018-12857
| People v Dayshawn V. |
| 2020 NY Slip Op 00311 |
| Decided on January 15, 2020 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on January 15, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
BETSY BARROS
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
2018-12857
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Dayshawn . (Anonymous), appellant. (S.C.I. No. 1809/18) Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Paul Wiener of counsel), for appellant.
v
Dayshawn . (Anonymous), appellant. (S.C.I. No. 1809/18) Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Paul Wiener of counsel), for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Suzanne Melendez, J., at plea; Ushir Pandit-Durant, J., at sentence), imposed September 6, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
RIVERA, J.P., MALTESE, BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.