Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020

People v. Mikhail T.

People v. Mikhail T.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 24, 2020
184 A.D.3d 880; 124 N.Y.S.3d 225; 2020 NY Slip Op 3549
People v. Mikhail T.

Opinion

People v Mikhail T. (2020 NY Slip Op 03549)
People v Mikhail T.
2020 NY Slip Op 03549
Decided on June 24, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 24, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JEFFREY A. COHEN
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2017-02410
(Ind. No. 27/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Mikhail T. (Anonymous), appellant.




Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Hannah Zhao of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, Joseph N. Ferdenzi, and Timothy R. McGrath of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Robert Schwartz, J.), imposed January 18, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 340; People v Batista, 167 AD3d 69, 81). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 261; People v Batista, 167 AD3d at 78).

BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.