Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020

Carver Fed. Sav. Bank v. Campbell

Carver Fed. Sav. Bank v. Campbell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 7, 2020
2020 NY Slip Op 05485
Carver Fed. Sav. Bank v. Campbell

Opinion

Carver Fed. Sav. Bank v Campbell (2020 NY Slip Op 05485)
Carver Fed. Sav. Bank v Campbell
2020 NY Slip Op 05485
Decided on October 7, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 7, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

2018-06261
(Index No. 504086/13)

[*1]Carver Federal Savings Bank, plaintiff,

v

Wilson L. Campbell, etc., et al., respondents, et al., defendants; Waterfall Victoria Grantor Trust II, Series G, nonparty-appellant.




Hahn & Hessen, LLP, New York, NY (Robert J. Malatak and Brigitte R. Rose of counsel), for nonparty-appellant.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, nonparty Waterfall Victoria Grantor Trust II, Series G, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Noach Dear, J.), dated November 20, 2017. The order, in effect, denied those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants Wilson L. Campbell and Judith Brown-Campbell, to strike those defendants' answer, and for an order of reference.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants Wilson L. Campbell and Judith Brown-Campbell, to strike those defendants' answer, and for an order of reference are granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a determination of the remaining branches of the plaintiff's motion.

We reverse the order for reasons stated in US Bank N.A. v Bochicchio (179 AD3d 1133, 1135) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Heiney (168 AD3d 1126, 1127).

MASTRO, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.