Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021

People v. Kinsler

People v. Kinsler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 17, 2021
140 N.Y.S.3d 710; 192 A.D.3d 913; 2021 NY Slip Op 08248 (New York Supplement, Third Series)
People v. Kinsler

Opinion

People v Kinsler (2021 NY Slip Op 08248)
People v Kinsler
2021 NY Slip Op 08248
Decided on March 17, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 17, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2018-09081

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Derrick Kinsler, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 10137/18)




Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Dalourny Nemorin of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and William H. Branigan of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Suzanne J. Melendez, J., at plea; Eugene M. Guarino, J., at sentence), imposed June 25, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).

RIVERA, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.