Strife v. Wieczorek
Strife v. Wieczorek
192 A.D.3d 1502; 140 N.Y.S.3d 813; 2021 NY Slip Op 01620
Opinion
Strife v Wieczorek (2021 NY Slip Op 01620)
Decided on March 19, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
289 CA 20-00975
| Strife v Wieczorek |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 01620 |
| Decided on March 19, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on March 19, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
289 CA 20-00975
[*1]JAMES STRIFE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
ALEC J. WIECZOREK, II, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF SALLY C. JEWELL, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND CHRISTINE M. BERNARD, DEFENDANT.
v
ALEC J. WIECZOREK, II, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF SALLY C. JEWELL, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND CHRISTINE M. BERNARD, DEFENDANT.
CAMARDO LAW FIRM, P.C., AUBURN (JUSTIN T. HUFFMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.), entered January 6, 2020. The order, among other things, dismissed the amended complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: March 19, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.