Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021

Matter of State of N.Y. v. Kenneth

Matter of State of N.Y. v. Kenneth
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 15, 2021
193 A.D.3d 1229; 142 N.Y.S.3d 439; 2021 NY Slip Op 02335
Matter of State of N.Y. v. Kenneth

Opinion

Matter of State of N.Y. v Kenneth (2021 NY Slip Op 02335)
Matter of State of N.Y. v Kenneth
2021 NY Slip Op 02335
Decided on April 15, 2021
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:April 15, 2021

529584

[*1]In the Matter of State of New York, Respondent,

v

Kenneth II., Appellant.


Calendar Date:September 9, 2020
Before:Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Aarons and Colangelo, JJ.

Adam H. Van Buskirk, Auburn, for appellant.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Jonathan D. Hitsous of counsel), for respondent.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Reynolds Fitzgerald, J.), entered June 5, 2019 in Cortland County, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10, to find respondent to be a dangerous sex offender and confined respondent to a secure treatment facility.

This Court previously withheld decision with respect to this appeal and remitted the matter to Supreme Court for a posttrial Frye hearing (190 AD3d 33, 48 [2020]). Before such hearing could be held, Oneida County Court (Amoroso, J.) conducted an annual review proceeding and, in February 2021, determined that respondent does not currently suffer from a mental abnormality. Accordingly, respondent was released from civil confinement and is therefore no longer under civil management pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10. Thereafter, Supreme Court (Masler, J.) granted respondent's unopposed motion to dismiss the Frye hearing as moot. Given respondent's release from confinement, the remaining issues presented for review on this appeal are moot (see Matter of Miguel II. v State of New York, 178 AD3d 1157, 1159 [2019]).

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Aarons and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.