Thompson v. One Genny, LLC
Thompson v. One Genny, LLC
195 A.D.3d 1462; 145 N.Y.S.3d 464; 2021 NY Slip Op 03758
Opinion
Thompson v One Genny, LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 03758)
Decided on June 11, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
606 CA 20-01008
| Thompson v One Genny, LLC |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 03758 |
| Decided on June 11, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 11, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
606 CA 20-01008
[*1]MICHELLE THOMPSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
ONE GENNY, LLC, VILLAGE STATION, LLC, AND VILLAGE OF NEW HARTFORD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
v
ONE GENNY, LLC, VILLAGE STATION, LLC, AND VILLAGE OF NEW HARTFORD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
RALPH W. FUSCO, UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
MARK D. GORIS, CAZENOVIA, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT ONE GENNY, LLC.
SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (DEVON M. CONROY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT VILLAGE STATION, LLC.
LEVENE GOULDIN & THOMPSON, LLP, VESTAL (MARGARET J. FOWLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT VILLAGE OF NEW HARTFORD.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (David A. Murad, J.), entered May 8, 2020. The order granted the motions of defendants for summary judgment and dismissed the amended complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court.
Entered: June 11, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.