People v. Soto
People v. Soto
152 N.Y.S.3d 842; 198 A.D.3d 930; 2021 NY Slip Op 05732
(New York Supplement, Third Series)
Opinion
People v Soto (2021 NY Slip Op 05732)
Decided on October 20, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.
2019-05478
2019-05480
(Ind. Nos. 4322/18, 6088/18)
| People v Soto |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 05732 |
| Decided on October 20, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on October 20, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.
2019-05478
2019-05480
(Ind. Nos. 4322/18, 6088/18)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Danny Soto, appellant.
v
Danny Soto, appellant.
Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Steven R. Berko of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Gamaliel Marrero of counsel; Nicole Hsuan on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin P. Murphy, J.), both imposed April 2, 2019, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.
The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
MASTRO, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BRATHWAITE NELSON and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Acting Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.