People v. Murphy
People v. Murphy
2021 NY Slip Op 07309
Opinion
People v Murphy (2021 NY Slip Op 07309)
Decided on December 22, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.
2019-13149
(Ind. No. 4336/18)
| People v Murphy |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 07309 |
| Decided on December 22, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on December 22, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.
2019-13149
(Ind. No. 4336/18)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Byron Murphy, appellant.
v
Byron Murphy, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Keith Dolan of counsel; Jong Hwa Ryu on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin P. Murphy, J.), imposed October 29, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
DILLON, J.P., MILLER, CONNOLLY and DOWLING, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.