Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021

Marsfelder v. Karlquist

Marsfelder v. Karlquist
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 23, 2021
155 N.Y.S.3d 879; 200 A.D.3d 1737; 2021 NY Slip Op 07452 (New York Supplement, Third Series)
Marsfelder v. Karlquist

Opinion

Marsfelder v Karlquist (2021 NY Slip Op 07452)
Marsfelder v Karlquist
2021 NY Slip Op 07452
Decided on December 23, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 23, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

1096 CA 20-01511

[*1]KAYLEE MARSFELDER, PLAINTIFF,

v

JOHN P. KARLQUIST, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. ————————————————————-



JOHN P. KARLQUIST, ANNETT HOLDINGS, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS TMC TRANSPORTATION, AND NATIONAL TRUCK FUNDING, LLC, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,LAURIE MARSFELDER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)




SCHNITTER CICCARELLI MILLS, PLLC, WILLIAMSVILLE (PATRICIA S. CICCARELLI OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BENNETT SCHECHTER ARCURI & WILL LLP, BUFFALO (PETER D. CANTONE OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Ronald D. Ploetz, A.J.), entered November 5, 2020. The order denied the motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: December 23, 2021

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.