People v. Holman
People v. Holman
159 N.Y.S.3d 907; 202 A.D.3d 1106; 2022 NY Slip Op 01176
(New York Supplement, Third Series)
Opinion
People v Holman (2022 NY Slip Op 01176)
Decided on February 23, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
ROBERT J. MILLER
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.
2019-09483
| People v Holman |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 01176 |
| Decided on February 23, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 23, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
ROBERT J. MILLER
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.
2019-09483
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Kareem Holman, appellant.
v
Kareem Holman, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Mark W. Vorkink of counsel; Yasmine Bailey on the memorandum), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Jong Hwa Ryu on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ellen E. Edwards, J.), imposed June 28, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
CONNOLLY, J.P., RIVERA, MILLER and FORD, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.