People v. Freeman
People v. Freeman
204 A.D.3d 830; 164 N.Y.S.3d 484; 2022 NY Slip Op 02430
Opinion
People v Freeman (2022 NY Slip Op 02430)
Decided on April 13, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.
2020-00945
(Ind. No. 790/19)
| People v Freeman |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 02430 |
| Decided on April 13, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on April 13, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.
2020-00945
(Ind. No. 790/19)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Tashien Freeman, appellant.
v
Tashien Freeman, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Denise Pavlides, and Elise Bonine of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barry E. Warhit, J., at plea; Matthew J. D'Emic, J., at sentence), imposed January 8, 2020, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
BARROS, J.P., ROMAN, CHRISTOPHER and DOWLING, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.