Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022

People v. Frances

People v. Frances
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 28, 2022
204 A.D.3d 618; 165 N.Y.S.3d 319; 2022 NY Slip Op 02881
People v. Frances

Opinion

People v Frances (2022 NY Slip Op 02881)
People v Frances
2022 NY Slip Op 02881
Decided on April 28, 2022
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 28, 2022
Before: Gische, J.P., Webber, Friedman, Oing, Kennedy, JJ.

SCI No. 681/15 Appeal No. 15816 Case No. 2019-1877

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Luis Frances, Defendant-Appellant.




Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Lorca Morello of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Falicia A. Yancey of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about February 8, 2019, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court correctly assessed 30 points under the risk factor for the victim's age, based on its determination that the victim's age was 10 or less. That finding was supported by clear and convincing evidence. While the superior court information only charged defendant with conduct that occurred in November 2014, when the victim was 12 years old, the record contained reliable evidence that defendant first sexually abused the victim before her 11th birthday. The criminal complaint reflected the victim's statement that defendant first sexually abused her around the time of her eighth birthday, and defendant stated in a videotaped statement that "the first time was about two years ago," an admission that the abuse began when the victim was 10 years old. The conduct that occurred when the victim was 10 or under was part of the underlying disposition, and in assessing points regarding the current offense, the court was not limited to the offense of conviction (see People v Sincerbeaux, 27 NY3d 682, 687-688 [2016]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 28, 2022



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.