Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022

People v. Hill

People v. Hill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 8, 2022
167 N.Y.S.3d 818; 2022 NY Slip Op 03743 (New York Supplement, Third Series)
People v. Hill

Opinion

People v Hill (2022 NY Slip Op 03743)
People v Hill
2022 NY Slip Op 03743
Decided on June 8, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 8, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
PAUL WOOTEN
JOSEPH J. ZAYAS, JJ.

2021-07507
(Ind. No. 94/20)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

James Hill, appellant.




Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Michael J. Yavinsky, J.), imposed September 16, 2021, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 254, 257). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see id. at 255-256).

DILLON, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, CHAMBERS, WOOTEN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.