Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022

People v. St. Denis

People v. St. Denis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 1, 2022
2022 NY Slip Op 04262
People v. St. Denis

Opinion

People v St. Denis (2022 NY Slip Op 04262)
People v Denis
2022 NY Slip Op 04262
Decided on July 1, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 1, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

571 KA 21-00784

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

MARCUS ST. DENIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)




LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JAMES B. RITTS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (Craig J. Doran, J.), rendered May 4, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of sexual abuse in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [1]). We agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because Supreme Court's oral colloquy used overbroad language that mischaracterized the wavier as an "absolute bar" to the taking of an appeal (People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; see People v DeMarco, 191 AD3d 1428, 1428 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 36 NY3d 1119 [2021]; People v Shantz, 186 AD3d 1076, 1077 [4th Dept 2020]). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Finally, the certificate of conviction and the uniform sentence and commitment form incorrectly reflect that defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender and must be amended to reflect that he was sentenced as a second violent felony offender (see People v Seymore, 188 AD3d 1767, 1770 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 1100 [2021]).

Entered: July 1, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.