Hope v. Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C.
Hope v. Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C.
174 N.Y.S.3d 642; 208 A.D.3d 1656; 2022 NY Slip Op 05489
(New York Supplement, Third Series)
Opinion
Hope v Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C. (2022 NY Slip Op 05489)
Decided on September 30, 2022
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ. (Filed Sept. 30, 2022.)
MOTION NO. (378/22) CA 21-01333.
| Hope v Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C. |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 05489 |
| Decided on September 30, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on September 30, 2022
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ. (Filed Sept. 30, 2022.)
MOTION NO. (378/22) CA 21-01333.
[*1]VALERIE HOPE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES, P.C., AND JOHN D. WRIGHT, ESQ., AS PRINCIPAL OF BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES, P.C., AS COUNSEL OF BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES, P.C., AND INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
v
BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES, P.C., AND JOHN D. WRIGHT, ESQ., AS PRINCIPAL OF BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES, P.C., AS COUNSEL OF BARTLETT, PONTIFF, STEWART & RHODES, P.C., AND INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.