People v. Santiago-Jeronimo
People v. Santiago-Jeronimo
174 N.Y.S.3d 893; 2022 NY Slip Op 05719
(New York Supplement, Third Series)
Opinion
People v Santiago-Jeronimo (2022 NY Slip Op 05719)
Decided on October 12, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.
2020-02939
(Ind. No. 310/19)
| People v Santiago-Jeronimo |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 05719 |
| Decided on October 12, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on October 12, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.
2020-02939
(Ind. No. 310/19)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Jose Santiago-Jeronimo, appellant.
v
Jose Santiago-Jeronimo, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Anna Kou of counsel), for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Barry Kron, J.), imposed July 10, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, ZAYAS and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.