People v. Curtis
People v. Curtis
176 N.Y.S.3d 798; 210 A.D.3d 904; 2022 NY Slip Op 06491
(New York Supplement, Third Series)
Opinion
People v Curtis (2022 NY Slip Op 06491)
Decided on November 16, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
PAUL WOOTEN
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.
2019-03283
(Ind. No. 227/18)
| People v Curtis |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 06491 |
| Decided on November 16, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on November 16, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
PAUL WOOTEN
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.
2019-03283
(Ind. No. 227/18)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Cyril Curtis, appellant.
v
Cyril Curtis, appellant.
Warren S. Hecht, Forest Hills, NY, for appellant.
Thomas E. Walsh II, District Attorney, New City, NY (Jacob B. Sher of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Larry J. Schwartz, J.), imposed March 5, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
CONNOLLY, J.P., IANNACCI, WOOTEN and WAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.