People ex rel. Konan v. Imperati
People ex rel. Konan v. Imperati
188 N.Y.S.3d 725; 2023 NY Slip Op 03084
(New York Supplement, Third Series)
Opinion
People ex rel. Konan v Imperati (2023 NY Slip Op 03084)
Decided on June 9, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.
2023-04801
| People ex rel. Konan v Imperati |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 03084 |
| Decided on June 9, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 9, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.
2023-04801
[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Ryanne Konan, on behalf of Camay Pryce, petitioner,
v
Kirk Imperati, etc., et al., respondents.
v
Kirk Imperati, etc., et al., respondents.
William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Jennifer L. Fluck and Anna Diehn of counsel), respondent pro se and for respondent Kirk Imperati.
Ryanne Konan, Wappingers Falls, NY, petitioner pro se.
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Camay Pryce upon her own recognizance or, in the alternative, to set reasonable bail upon Dutchess County Indictment Nos. 24/2023 and 70231/2023.
ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.The determination of the County Court, Dutchess County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger , 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson , 48 NY2d 230).
DILLON, J.P., IANNACCI, MALTESE and WAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER: Maria T. FasuloClerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.