People ex rel. Rankin v. Brann
People ex rel. Rankin v. Brann
219 A.D.3d 756; 193 N.Y.S.3d 334; 2023 NY Slip Op 04321
Opinion
People ex rel. Rankin v Brann (2023 NY Slip Op 04321)
Decided on August 16, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
JANICE A. TAYLOR
LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.
2023-06533
| People ex rel. Rankin v Brann |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 04321 |
| Decided on August 16, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on August 16, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
JANICE A. TAYLOR
LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.
2023-06533
[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Douglas G. Rankin, on behalf of Rayshawn Moore, petitioner,
v
Cynthia Brann, etc., respondent.
v
Cynthia Brann, etc., respondent.
Douglas G. Rankin, Brooklyn, NY, petitioner pro se.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Rayshawn Moore upon his own recognizance or, in the alternative, to set reasonable bail upon Kings County Indictment Nos. 72675/2021 and 70727/2023.
ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.The determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger , 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson , 48 NY2d 230).
CONNOLLY, J.P., MALTESE, TAYLOR and VENTURA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Acting Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.