People v. Fata
People v. Fata
220 A.D.3d 886; 196 N.Y.S.3d 571; 2023 NY Slip Op 05271
Opinion
People v Fata (2023 NY Slip Op 05271)
Decided on October 18, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
WILLIAM G. FORD
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.
2022-08996
(Ind. No. 70042/22)
| People v Fata |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 05271 |
| Decided on October 18, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on October 18, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
WILLIAM G. FORD
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.
2022-08996
(Ind. No. 70042/22)
[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,
v
Malik Fata, appellant.
v
Malik Fata, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Joshua M. Levine of counsel), for appellant.
Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Thomas B. Litsky of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Lisa Grey, J.), imposed October 13, 2022, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, FORD and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Acting Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.