Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024

People v. McCorkle

People v. McCorkle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 25, 2024
2024 NY Slip Op 04574
People v. McCorkle

Opinion

People v McCorkle (2024 NY Slip Op 04574)
People v McCorkle
2024 NY Slip Op 04574
Decided on September 25, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 25, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P.
PAUL WOOTEN
HELEN VOUTSINAS
LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.

2023-01124
(Ind. No. 139/20)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Anthony McCorkle, appellant.




Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (James A. Tomberlin of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Thomas B. Litsky, Timothy Pezzoli, and James Joseph Gandia of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Lisa Grey, J.), imposed January 9, 2023, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see id. at 255-256; People v Lowe, 216 AD3d 670, 671).

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., WOOTEN, VOUTSINAS and LOVE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.