Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024

People v. Johnson

People v. Johnson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 31, 2024
2024 NY Slip Op 05414
People v. Johnson

Opinion

People v Johnson (2024 NY Slip Op 05414)
People v Johnson
2024 NY Slip Op 05414
Decided on October 31, 2024
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 31, 2024
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Shulman, Michael, JJ.

SCI No. 73990/23 Appeal No. 2941 Case No. 2023-04477

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Elik Johnson, Defendant-Appellant.




Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Benjamin Wiener of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Robert Butlien of counsel), for respondent



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Cory Weston, J.), rendered August 18, 2023, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a firearm, and sentencing him to three years of probation, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the mandatory surcharge and fees imposed at sentencing, and otherwise affirmed.

The record demonstrates that defendant validly waived his right to appeal (People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). Contrary to defendant's contention, there was nothing misleading about the court's colloquy, and defendant confirmed that he had discussed the written waiver with his counsel (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 560 [2019]). Thus, the valid waiver of appeal forecloses review of defendant's excessive sentence claim (see Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256). In any event, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Based on our own interest of justice powers, we vacate the mandatory surcharge and fees imposed on defendant at sentencing (see People v Chirinos, 190 AD3d 434 [1st Dept 2021]). We note that the People do not oppose this relief.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 31, 2024



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.