Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025

People v. Scipio

People v. Scipio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 24, 2025
2025 NY Slip Op 02416
People v. Scipio

Opinion

People v Scipio (2025 NY Slip Op 02416)
People v Scipio
2025 NY Slip Op 02416
Decided on April 24, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 24, 2025
Before: Moulton, J.P., Mendez, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Rosado, JJ.

Ind No. 1007/20|Appeal No. 4167|Case No. 2021-03498|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Desmomd Scipio, Defendant-Appellant.




Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Ji Hyun Rhim of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Andrew John Loizides of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J.), rendered September 22, 2021,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 24, 2025

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,

First Department.



Opinion

People v Scipio (2025 NY Slip Op 02416)
People v Scipio
2025 NY Slip Op 02416
Decided on April 24, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 24, 2025
Before: Moulton, J.P., Mendez, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Rosado, JJ.

Ind No. 1007/20|Appeal No. 4167|Case No. 2021-03498|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Desmomd Scipio, Defendant-Appellant.




Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Ji Hyun Rhim of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Andrew John Loizides of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J.), rendered September 22, 2021,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 24, 2025

Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.



Opinion

People v Scipio (2025 NY Slip Op 02416)
People v Scipio
2025 NY Slip Op 02416
Decided on April 24, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 24, 2025
Before: Moulton, J.P., Mendez, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Rosado, JJ.

Ind No. 1007/20|Appeal No. 4167|Case No. 2021-03498|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Desmomd Scipio, Defendant-Appellant.




Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Ji Hyun Rhim of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Andrew John Loizides of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J.), rendered September 22, 2021,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 24, 2025

Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.