Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025

People v. Kevin A.

People v. Kevin A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 15, 2025
2025 NY Slip Op 02168
People v. Kevin A.

Opinion

People v Kevin A. (2025 NY Slip Op 02168)
People v Kevin A.
2025 NY Slip Op 02168
Decided on April 15, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 15, 2025
Before: Kern, J.P., Gesmer, Mendez, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ.

Ind. No. 70345/20|Appeal No. 4107|Case No. 2022-02771|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Kevin A., Appellant.




Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Elizabeth M. Vasily of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ethan Solomon of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen M. Antignani, J.), rendered June 07, 2022,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 15, 2025

Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.



Opinion

People v Kevin A. (2025 NY Slip Op 02168)
People v Kevin A.
2025 NY Slip Op 02168
Decided on April 15, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 15, 2025
Before: Kern, J.P., Gesmer, Mendez, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ.

Ind No. 70345/20|Appeal No. 4107|Case No. 2022-02771|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Kevin A., Appellant.




Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Elizabeth M. Vasily of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ethan Solomon of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen M. Antignani, J.), rendered June 07, 2022,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 15, 2025

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,

First Department.



Opinion

People v Kevin A. (2025 NY Slip Op 02168)
People v Kevin A.
2025 NY Slip Op 02168
Decided on April 15, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 15, 2025
Before: Kern, J.P., Gesmer, Mendez, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ.

Ind. No. 70345/20|Appeal No. 4107|Case No. 2022-02771|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Kevin A., Appellant.




Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Elizabeth M. Vasily of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ethan Solomon of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen M. Antignani, J.), rendered June 07, 2022,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 15, 2025

Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.