Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025

People v. Smith

People v. Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 25, 2025
2025 NY Slip Op 02486
People v. Smith

Opinion

People v Smith (2025 NY Slip Op 02486)
People v Smith
2025 NY Slip Op 02486
Decided on April 25, 2025
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 25, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CURRAN, SMITH, NOWAK, AND DELCONTE, JJ.

276 KA 22-00178

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ERIC SMITH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.




THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ALLISON V. MCMAHON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. KEANE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (APRIL J. ORLOWSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Susan M. Eagan, J.), rendered January 7, 2022. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. We agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied — US —, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Harold, 233 AD3d 1503, 1503 [4th Dept 2024]) and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see Harold, 233 AD3d at 1503). However, we conclude that defendant's sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: April 25, 2025

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Opinion

People v Smith (2025 NY Slip Op 02486)
People v Smith
2025 NY Slip Op 02486
Decided on April 25, 2025
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 25, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CURRAN, SMITH, NOWAK, AND DELCONTE, JJ.

276 KA 22-00178

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ERIC SMITH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.




THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ALLISON V. MCMAHON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. KEANE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (APRIL J. ORLOWSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Susan M. Eagan, J.), rendered January 7, 2022. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. We agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied — US —, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Harold, 233 AD3d 1503, 1503 [4th Dept 2024]) and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see Harold, 233 AD3d at 1503). However, we conclude that defendant's sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: April 25, 2025

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.