People v. Hiciano
Opinion
| People v Hiciano |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 03543 |
| Decided on June 10, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: June 10, 2025
Before: Moulton, J.P., González, Mendez, Pitt-Burke, Rosado, JJ.
Ind. No. 71052/21|Appeal No. 4565|Case No. 2023-05124|
v
Kirby Hiciano, Defendant-Appellant.
Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jane Merrill of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Aidan Sanchez of counsel), for respondent.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laurence E. Busching, J.), rendered September 22, 2023,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: June 10, 2025
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.
Opinion
People v Hiciano (2025 NY Slip Op 03543)
| People v Hiciano |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 03543 |
| Decided on June 10, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: June 10, 2025
Before: Moulton, J.P., González, Mendez, Pitt-Burke, Rosado, JJ.
Ind. No. 71052/21|Appeal No. 4565|Case No. 2023-05124|
v
Kirby Hiciano, Defendant-Appellant.
Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jane Merrill of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Aidan Sanchez of counsel), for respondent.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laurence E. Busching, J.), rendered September 22, 2023,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: June 10, 2025
Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.