People v. Wright
Opinion
People v Wright (2025 NY Slip Op 04025)
| People v Wright |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 04025 |
| Decided on July 2, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 2, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
LARA J. GENOVESI, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
CARL J. LANDICINO
PHILLIP HOM, JJ.
2023-03827
(Ind. No. 70517/22)
v
Emanuel Wright, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Marissa Reap of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Rebecca Siegel on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Susan Quirk, J.), imposed April 4, 2023, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
GENOVESI, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, DOWLING, LANDICINO and HOM, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Opinion
| People v Wright |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 04025 |
| Decided on July 2, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 2, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
LARA J. GENOVESI, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
CARL J. LANDICINO
PHILLIP HOM, JJ.
2023-03827
(Ind. No. 70517/22)
v
Emanuel Wright, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Marissa Reap of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Rebecca Siegel on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Susan Quirk, J.), imposed April 4, 2023, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
GENOVESI, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, DOWLING, LANDICINO and HOM, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.