Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025

People v. Jones

People v. Jones
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 25, 2025
2025 NY Slip Op 03823
People v. Jones

Opinion

People v Jones (2025 NY Slip Op 03823)

People v Jones
2025 NY Slip Op 03823
Decided on June 25, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 25, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
LILLIAN WAN
PHILLIP HOM, JJ.

2022-09667
2022-09668

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Rayvon Jones, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 3350/19, 70472/22)




Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Robert C. Langdon of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (William Harrington, J., at plea under Indictment No. 70472/22; Matthew J. D'Emic, J., at plea under Indictment No. 3350/19 and at sentences), both rendered November 22, 2022, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree and assault in the third degree under Indictment No. 3350/19, and attempted assault in the second degree under Indictment No. 70472/22, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Murray, 169 AD3d 227; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252).

DILLON, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, WAN and HOM, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Opinion

People v Jones (2025 NY Slip Op 03823)
People v Jones
2025 NY Slip Op 03823
Decided on June 25, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 25, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
LILLIAN WAN
PHILLIP HOM, JJ.

2022-09667
2022-09668

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Rayvon Jones, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 3350/19, 70472/22)




Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Robert C. Langdon of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (William Harrington, J., at plea under Indictment No. 70472/22; Matthew J. D'Emic, J., at plea under Indictment No. 3350/19 and at sentences), both rendered November 22, 2022, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree and assault in the third degree under Indictment No. 3350/19, and attempted assault in the second degree under Indictment No. 70472/22, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Murray, 169 AD3d 227; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252).

DILLON, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, WAN and HOM, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.