People v. Fortune
Opinion
People v Fortune (2025 NY Slip Op 03817)
| People v Fortune |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 03817 |
| Decided on June 25, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 25, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
BARRY E. WARHIT
LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.
2022-07878
(Ind. No. 5875/18)
v
Mario Fortune, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Anna Jouravleva of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Michael Bierce of counsel; Ruth Reid on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Evelyn Laporte, J.), imposed September 1, 2022, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
DILLON, J.P., MILLER, WARHIT and VENTURA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Opinion
| People v Fortune |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 03817 |
| Decided on June 25, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 25, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
BARRY E. WARHIT
LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.
2022-07878
(Ind. No. 5875/18)
v
Mario Fortune, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Anna Jouravleva of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Michael Bierce of counsel; Ruth Reid on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Evelyn Laporte, J.), imposed September 1, 2022, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
DILLON, J.P., MILLER, WARHIT and VENTURA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.