People v. Amoroso
Opinion
People v Amoroso (2025 NY Slip Op 03591)
| People v Amoroso |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 03591 |
| Decided on June 11, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 11, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
PAUL WOOTEN
HELEN VOUTSINAS
JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.
2023-08953
v
Alex Amoroso, appellant.
Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, NY, for appellant.
Robert V. Tendy, District Attorney, Carmel, NY (MaryJane MacCrae of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Putnam County (James F. Reitz, J.), dated October 1, 2018, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeal must be dismissed because no appeal lies from an order entered on consent of the appellant (see CPLR 5511; People v Jennings, 146 AD3d 823, 824; People v Johnson, 142 AD3d 1061; People v Dennis, 64 AD3d 760; People v Welch, 30 AD3d 392).
CONNOLLY, J.P., WOOTEN, VOUTSINAS and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Opinion
| People v Amoroso |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 03591 |
| Decided on June 11, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 11, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
PAUL WOOTEN
HELEN VOUTSINAS
JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.
2023-08953
v
Alex Amoroso, appellant.
Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, NY, for appellant.
Robert V. Tendy, District Attorney, Carmel, NY (MaryJane MacCrae of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Putnam County (James F. Reitz, J.), dated October 1, 2018, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeal must be dismissed because no appeal lies from an order entered on consent of the appellant (see CPLR 5511; People v Jennings, 146 AD3d 823, 824; People v Johnson, 142 AD3d 1061; People v Dennis, 64 AD3d 760; People v Welch, 30 AD3d 392).
CONNOLLY, J.P., WOOTEN, VOUTSINAS and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.