Thomas v. Niagara Frontier Tr. Auth.
Thomas v. Niagara Frontier Tr. Auth.
2025 NY Slip Op 03963
Opinion
Thomas v Niagara Frontier Tr. Auth. (2025 NY Slip Op 03963)
| Thomas v Niagara Frontier Tr. Auth. |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 03963 |
| Decided on June 27, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 27, 2025
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., BANNISTER, GREENWOOD, AND NOWAK, JJ. (Filed June 27, 2025.)
MOTION NO. (19/25) CA 24-00368.
[*1]DEVERE THOMAS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSIT AUTHORITY, NFTA POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THEIR AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, AND NFTA POLICE OFFICER ROBERT GAWLAK, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
v
NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSIT AUTHORITY, NFTA POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THEIR AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, AND NFTA POLICE OFFICER ROBERT GAWLAK, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Opinion
Thomas v Niagara Frontier Tr. Auth. (2025 NY Slip Op 03963)
Decided on June 27, 2025
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., BANNISTER, GREENWOOD, AND NOWAK, JJ. (Filed June 27, 2025.)
MOTION NO. (19/25) CA 24-00368.
| Thomas v Niagara Frontier Tr. Auth. |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 03963 |
| Decided on June 27, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 27, 2025
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., BANNISTER, GREENWOOD, AND NOWAK, JJ. (Filed June 27, 2025.)
MOTION NO. (19/25) CA 24-00368.
[*1]DEVERE THOMAS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSIT AUTHORITY, NFTA POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THEIR AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, AND NFTA POLICE OFFICER ROBERT GAWLAK, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
v
NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSIT AUTHORITY, NFTA POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THEIR AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, AND NFTA POLICE OFFICER ROBERT GAWLAK, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.