Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025

People v. Morris

People v. Morris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 9, 2025
2025 NY Slip Op 05579
People v. Morris

Opinion

People v Morris (2025 NY Slip Op 05579)

People v Morris
2025 NY Slip Op 05579
Decided on October 09, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 09, 2025
Before: Kern, J.P., Friedman, Kapnick, Gesmer, Rodriguez, JJ.

Ind No. 70721/21, 2392/19|Appeal No. 4898-4899|Case No. 2023-02655 2023-02690|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Andre Morris, Defendant-Appellant.




Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Katherine A. Triffon of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph A. Fabrizio, J.), rendered April 19, 2023,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 9, 2025

Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.



Opinion

People v Morris (2025 NY Slip Op 05579)

People v Morris
2025 NY Slip Op 05579
Decided on October 09, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 09, 2025
Before: Kern, J.P., Friedman, Kapnick, Gesmer, Rodriguez, JJ.

Ind No. 70721/21, 2392/19|Appeal No. 4898-4899|Case No. 2023-02655 2023-02690|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Andre Morris, Defendant-Appellant.




Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Katherine A. Triffon of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph A. Fabrizio, J.), rendered April 19, 2023,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 9, 2025

Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.



Opinion

People v Morris (2025 NY Slip Op 05579)

People v Morris
2025 NY Slip Op 05579
Decided on October 09, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 09, 2025
Before: Kern, J.P., Friedman, Kapnick, Gesmer, Rodriguez, JJ.

Ind No. 70721/21, 2392/19|Appeal No. 4898-4899|Case No. 2023-02655 2023-02690|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Andre Morris, Defendant-Appellant.




Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Katherine A. Triffon of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph A. Fabrizio, J.), rendered April 19, 2023,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is

hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 9, 2025

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,

First Department.



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.