People v. Balbi
Opinion
People v Balbi (2025 NY Slip Op 05308)
| People v Balbi |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 05308 |
| Decided on October 02, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: October 02, 2025
Before: Moulton, J.P., Kennedy, González, Shulman, Rodriguez, JJ.
Ind No. 998/20|Appeal No. 4832|Case No. 2024-02499|
v
Amaury Balbi, Defendant-Appellant.
Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Abigail Everett of counsel), for appellant.
Muriel Goode-Trufant, Corporation Counsel, New York (Jonathan Schoepp-Wong of counsel), for respondent.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Kiesel, J.), rendered May 17, 2022,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: October 2, 2025
Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.
Opinion
People v Balbi (2025 NY Slip Op 05308)
| People v Balbi |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 05308 |
| Decided on October 02, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: October 02, 2025
Before: Moulton, J.P., Kennedy, González, Shulman, Rodriguez, JJ.
Ind No. 998/20|Appeal No. 4832|Case No. 2024-02499|
v
Amaury Balbi, Defendant-Appellant.
Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Abigail Everett of counsel), for appellant.
Muriel Goode-Trufant, Corporation Counsel, New York (Jonathan Schoepp-Wong of counsel), for respondent.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Kiesel, J.), rendered May 17, 2022,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: October 2, 2025
Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.