Matter of Sajetta v. Litman
Opinion
Matter of Sajetta v Litman (2025 NY Slip Op 05202)
| Matter of Sajetta v Litman |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 05202 |
| Decided on September 30, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: September 30, 2025
Before: Kern, J.P., Scarpulla, Kapnick, Gesmer, Hagler, JJ.
Index No. 72641/23|Appeal No. 4793|Case No. 2025-03071|
v
Hon. Sara Litman, Respondent.
Anjelu Sajetta, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: September 30, 2025
Opinion
Matter of Sajetta v Litman (2025 NY Slip Op 05202)
| Matter of Sajetta v Litman |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 05202 |
| Decided on September 30, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: September 30, 2025
Before: Kern, J.P., Scarpulla, Kapnick, Gesmer, Hagler, JJ.
Index No. 72641/23|Appeal No. 4793|Case No. 2025-03071|
v
Hon. Sara Litman, Respondent.
Anjelu Sajetta, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: September 30, 2025
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.