People v. Andujar
Opinion
<div>People v Andujar - 2026 NY Slip Op 01978
<div> skip to main content </div>
<div> <p>It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.</p> </div>
<div> <header> <div> <img src="/reporter/images/nys-logo-white.svg" alt=""> </div> <div> <span title="Law Reporting Bureau Home Page">Law Reporting <br>Bureau <span></span></span> <span>Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter</span> <nav> Court Decisions Resources About </nav> </div> <div> <img src="/reporter/images/lrb-seal.png" alt=""> </div> </header> </div>
<nav> <ol> <li>Home</li> <li>All Court Decisions</li> <li>Decisions</li> </ol> </nav> <div> <div> <h1>People v Andujar</h1> <p>2026 NY Slip Op 01978</p> <p>April 1, 2026</p> <p>Appellate Division, Second Department</p> <p>Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</p> <p>This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.</p> </div> <div> <p>The People of the State of New York, respondent,</p> <p>v</p> <p>Santiago A. Andujar, appellant.</p> </div> <p>Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department</p> <p>Decided on April 1, 2026</p> <p>2021-05208, (Ind. No. 57/20)</p> <p>Colleen D. Duffy, J.P.</p> <p>Paul Wooten</p> <p>Janice A. Taylor</p> <p>Phillip Hom, JJ.</p> <div> <p>Gary E. Eisenberg, New City, NY, for appellant.</p> <p>Anthony P. Parisi, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Anna K. Diehn of counsel), for respondent.</p> </div> <span>[*1]</span> <p>DECISION & ORDER</p> <p>Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Jessica Segal, J.), rendered July 15, 2021, convicting him of predatory sexual assault against a child, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.</p> <p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.</p> <p>The defendant was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of predatory sexual assault against a child (Penal Law § 130.96).</p> <p>The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (<i>see People v Bolton</i>, 235 AD3d 995; <i>People v Young</i>, 225 AD3d 903). Appellate review of the defendant's contentions regarding the factual sufficiency of the indictment, which are nonjurisdictional, was forfeited by his plea of guilty and, in any event, is foreclosed by his valid waiver of his right to appeal (<i>see</i> <i>People v Griffin</i>, 173 AD3d 1203, 1205).</p> <p>The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his</p> <p>contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (<i>see</i> <i>People v Lopez</i>, 6 NY3d 248, 256).</p> <p>DUFFY, J.P., WOOTEN, TAYLOR and HOM, JJ., concur.</p> <p>ENTER:</p> <p>Darrell M. Joseph</p> <p>Clerk of the Court</p> </div>
<div> <footer> <div> <p>Court Decisions</p> All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search </div> <div> <p>Resources</p> RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index </div> <div> <p>About</p> About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter </div> <div> <p>Quick Contact Info</p> <p>17 Lodge Street</p> <p>Albany, NY 12207</p> <p>Phone: (518) 453-6900</p> </div> </footer> </div> <div> <p>Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.</p> </div>
</div>
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.