Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026

Matter of Tarallo v. Hyun Chin Kim

Matter of Tarallo v. Hyun Chin Kim
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 1, 2026
2026 NY Slip Op 01973
Matter of Tarallo v. Hyun Chin Kim

Opinion

<div>Matter of Tarallo v Hyun Chin Kim - 2026 NY Slip Op 01973

<div> skip to main content </div>

<div> <p>It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.</p> </div>

<div> <header> <div> <img src="/reporter/images/nys-logo-white.svg" alt=""> </div> <div> <span title="Law Reporting Bureau Home Page">Law Reporting <br>Bureau <span></span></span> <span>Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter</span> <nav> Court Decisions Resources About </nav> </div> <div> <img src="/reporter/images/lrb-seal.png" alt=""> </div> </header> </div>

<nav> <ol> <li>Home</li> <li>All Court Decisions</li> <li>Decisions</li> </ol> </nav> <div> <div> <h1>Matter of Tarallo v Hyun Chin Kim</h1> <p>2026 NY Slip Op 01973</p> <p>April 1, 2026</p> <p>Appellate Division, Second Department</p> <p>Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</p> <p>This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.</p> </div> <div> <p>In the Matter of Lisa Tarallo, petitioner,</p> <p>v</p> <p>Hyun Chin Kim, etc., respondent.</p> </div> <p>Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department</p> <p>Decided on April 1, 2026</p> <p>2025-13524</p> <p>Lara J. Genovesi, J.P.</p> <p>William G. Ford</p> <p>Helen Voutsinas</p> <p>Donna-Marie E. Golia, JJ.</p> <div> <p>The Bellantoni Law Firm, PLLC, Scarsdale, NY (Amy L. Bellantoni of counsel), for petitioner.</p> </div> <span>[*1]</span> <p>DECISION &amp; JUDGMENT</p> <p>Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Hyun Chin Kim, a Justice of the County Court, Orange County, to issue a determination on the petitioner's application to amend her pistol licence.</p> <p>ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.</p> <p>The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (<i>see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman</i>, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.</p> <p>GENOVESI, J.P., FORD, VOUTSINAS and GOLIA, JJ., concur.</p> <p>ENTER:</p> <p>Darrell M. Joseph</p> <p>Clerk of the Court</p> </div>

<div> <footer> <div> <p>Court Decisions</p> All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search </div> <div> <p>Resources</p> RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting &amp; Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index </div> <div> <p>About</p> About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter </div> <div> <p>Quick Contact Info</p> <p>17 Lodge Street</p> <p>Albany, NY 12207</p> <p>Phone: (518) 453-6900</p> </div> </footer> </div> <div> <p>Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.</p> </div>

</div>

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.