Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026

People v. Faulkner

People v. Faulkner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 23, 2026
2026 NY Slip Op 02467
People v. Faulkner

Opinion

<div>People v Faulkner - 2026 NY Slip Op 02467

<div> skip to main content </div>

<div> <p>It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.</p> </div>

<div> <header> <div> <img src="/reporter/images/nys-logo-white.svg" alt=""> </div> <div> <span title="Law Reporting Bureau Home Page">Law Reporting <br>Bureau <span></span></span> <span>Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter</span> <nav> Court Decisions Resources About </nav> </div> <div> <img src="/reporter/images/lrb-seal.png" alt=""> </div> </header> </div>

<nav> <ol> <li>Home</li> <li>All Court Decisions</li> <li>Decisions</li> </ol> </nav> <div> <div> <h1>People v Faulkner</h1> <p>2026 NY Slip Op 02467</p> <p>April 23, 2026</p> <p>Appellate Division, First Department</p> <p>Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</p> <p>This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.</p> </div> <div> <p>The People of the State of New York, Respondent,</p> <p>v</p> <p>Jesse Faulkner, Defendant-Appellant.</p> </div> <p>Decided and Entered: April 23, 2026</p> <p>Ind No. 70284/23|Appeal No. 6432|Case No. 2024-06832|</p> <p>Before: Scarpulla, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Shulman, Chan, JJ. </p> <div> <p>Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Cathy Liu of counsel), for appellant.</p> <p>Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Michael D. Tarbutton of counsel), for respondent.</p> </div> <span>[*1]</span> <p>Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ann D. Thompson, J. at plea; Marisol M. Alonso, J. at sentencing), rendered February 22, 2024, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3½ years followed by five years of postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.</p> <p>Defendant's Second Amendment claim is unpreserved (<i>see</i> <i>People v Cabrera</i>, 41 NY3d 35, 42-51 [2023]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, while defendant has standing to assert his facial challenge notwithstanding that he never applied for a license (<i>see</i> <i>People v Johnson</i>, — NY3d —, 2025 NY Slip Op 06528, *2 [2025]), he fails to establish that his conviction is unconstitutional on the ground that <i>New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Assn., Inc. v Bruen</i> (597 US 1 [2022]) invalidated the "good moral character" requirement (<i>see</i> <i>People v Martinez</i>, 238 AD3d 423, 424 [1st Dept 2025], <i>lv denied</i> 44 NY3d 1067 [2026]; <i>People v Guzman</i>, 237 AD3d 570, 571 [1st Dept 2025], <i>lv denied</i> 44 NY3d 993 [2025]).</p> <p>Defendant's contention that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to preserve his Second Amendment claim is unreviewable on direct appeal because it involves matters not reflected in the record and thus must be raised in a CPL 440.10 motion (<i>see</i> <i>People v Williams</i>, 237 AD3d 569, 570 [1st Dept 2025], <i>lv denied</i> 44 NY3d 1014 [2025]; <i>People v Anderson</i>, 234 AD3d 603, 603-604 [1st Dept 2025], <i>lv</i> <i></i> <i>denied</i> 43 NY3d 943 [2025]). In any event, counsel was not ineffective because the claim had "little or no chance of success" (<i>People v Caban</i>, 5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]). </p> <p>We perceive no basis for reducing the term of postrelease supervision.</p> <p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.</p> <p>ENTERED: April 23, 2026</p> </div>

<div> <footer> <div> <p>Court Decisions</p> All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search </div> <div> <p>Resources</p> RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting &amp; Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index </div> <div> <p>About</p> About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter </div> <div> <p>Quick Contact Info</p> <p>17 Lodge Street</p> <p>Albany, NY 12207</p> <p>Phone: (518) 453-6900</p> </div> </footer> </div> <div> <p>Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.</p> </div>

</div>

Opinion

People v Faulkner - 2026 NY Slip Op 02467
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

People v Faulkner

2026 NY Slip Op 02467

April 23, 2026

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Jesse Faulkner, Defendant-Appellant.

Decided and Entered: April 23, 2026

Ind No. 70284/23|Appeal No. 6432|Case No. 2024-06832|

Before: Scarpulla, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Shulman, Chan, JJ.

Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Cathy Liu of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Michael D. Tarbutton of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ann D. Thompson, J. at plea; Marisol M. Alonso, J. at sentencing), rendered February 22, 2024, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3½ years followed by five years of postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's Second Amendment claim is unpreserved (see People v Cabrera, 41 NY3d 35, 42-51 [2023]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, while defendant has standing to assert his facial challenge notwithstanding that he never applied for a license (see People v Johnson, — NY3d —, 2025 NY Slip Op 06528, *2 [2025]), he fails to establish that his conviction is unconstitutional on the ground that New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v Bruen (597 US 1 [2022]) invalidated the "good moral character" requirement (see People v Martinez, 238 AD3d 423, 424 [1st Dept 2025], lv denied 44 NY3d 1067 [2026]; People v Guzman, 237 AD3d 570, 571 [1st Dept 2025], lv denied 44 NY3d 993 [2025]).

Defendant's contention that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to preserve his Second Amendment claim is unreviewable on direct appeal because it involves matters not reflected in the record and thus must be raised in a CPL 440.10 motion (see People v Williams, 237 AD3d 569, 570 [1st Dept 2025], lv denied 44 NY3d 1014 [2025]; People v Anderson, 234 AD3d 603, 603-604 [1st Dept 2025], lv denied 43 NY3d 943 [2025]). In any event, counsel was not ineffective because the claim had "little or no chance of success" (People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the term of postrelease supervision.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 23, 2026

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.