Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026

People v. Rojas

People v. Rojas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 16, 2026
2026 NY Slip Op 02346
People v. Rojas

Opinion

People v Rojas - 2026 NY Slip Op 02346
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

People v Rojas

2026 NY Slip Op 02346

April 16, 2026

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Christian Rojas, Defendant-Appellant.

Decided and Entered: April 16, 2026

SCI No. 73685/23|Appeal No. 6409|Case No. 2024-04569|

Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Higgitt, Rosado, O'neill Levy, Chan, JJ.

Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Leanna J. Duncan of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jacob C. Marcus of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen N. Biben, J.), rendered July 02, 2024,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 16, 2026

Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Opinion

<div>People v Rojas - 2026 NY Slip Op 02346

<div> skip to main content </div>

<div> <p>It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.</p> </div>

<div> <header> <div> <img src="/reporter/images/nys-logo-white.svg" alt=""> </div> <div> <span title="Law Reporting Bureau Home Page">Law Reporting <br>Bureau <span></span></span> <span>Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter</span> <nav> Court Decisions Resources About </nav> </div> <div> <img src="/reporter/images/lrb-seal.png" alt=""> </div> </header> </div>

<nav> <ol> <li>Home</li> <li>All Court Decisions</li> <li>Decisions</li> </ol> </nav> <div> <div> <h1>People v Rojas</h1> <p>2026 NY Slip Op 02346</p> <p>April 16, 2026</p> <p>Appellate Division, First Department</p> <p>Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</p> <p>This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.</p> </div> <div> <p>The People of the State of New York, Respondent,</p> <p>v</p> <p>Christian Rojas, Defendant-Appellant.</p> </div> <p>Decided and Entered: April 16, 2026</p> <p>SCI No. 73685/23|Appeal No. 6409|Case No. 2024-04569|</p> <p>Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Higgitt, Rosado, O'neill Levy, Chan, JJ. </p> <div> <p>Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Leanna J. Duncan of counsel), for appellant.</p> <p>Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jacob C. Marcus of counsel), for respondent.</p> </div> <span>[*1]</span> <p>An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen N. Biben, J.), rendered July 02, 2024,</p> <p>Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,</p> <p>It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.</p> <p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.</p> <p>ENTERED: April 16, 2026</p> <p>Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.</p> </div>

<div> <footer> <div> <p>Court Decisions</p> All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search </div> <div> <p>Resources</p> RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting &amp; Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index </div> <div> <p>About</p> About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter </div> <div> <p>Quick Contact Info</p> <p>17 Lodge Street</p> <p>Albany, NY 12207</p> <p>Phone: (518) 453-6900</p> </div> </footer> </div> <div> <p>Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.</p> </div>

</div>

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.