Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026

People v. Smith

People v. Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 19, 2026
2026 NY Slip Op 03121
People v. Smith

Opinion

People v Smith - 2026 NY Slip Op 03121
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

People v Smith

2026 NY Slip Op 03121

May 19, 2026

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Roderick Smith, Appellant.

Decided and Entered: May 19, 2026

SCI. No. 70862/22, 70865/22|Appeal No. 6669|Case No. 2024-04560|

Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Kapnick, Shulman, Michael, JJ.

Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Michael D. Tarbutton of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juan Merchan, J.), rendered July 10, 2024, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree and robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender on the attempted robbery in the second degree count, and as a second felony offender on the robbery in the third degree count, to concurrent terms of five years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's waivers of indictment were valid. While the plea minutes contain no specific reference to written waivers, the record as a whole demonstrates that defendant signed them "in open court in the presence of his attorney" (CPL 195.20; see People v Thompson, 234 AD3d 418, 418-419 [1st Dept 2025], lv denied 43 NY3d 947 [2025]; People v Mora, 227 AD3d 553, 553 [1st Dept 2024], lv denied 42 NY3d 929 [2024]).

Defendant's argument that one of the waivers was defective because it charged an offense not included in the underlying felony complaint is based on an incomplete reading of that felony complaint. In fact, the allegation in the waiver of indictment that defendant committed second-degree robbery on May 12, 2021, corresponded to a materially identical charge in the felony complaint (see People v Pierce, 14 NY3d 564, 571 [2010]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 19, 2026

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.