Matter of Gaddy v. Litman
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Matter of Gaddy v Litman
2026 NY Slip Op 03117
May 19, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
In re Matthew Gaddy, Petitioner,
v
Sara Litman, J.S.C., etc., et al., Respondents.
Decided and Entered: May 19, 2026
Appeal No. 6673, M-00546|Case No. 2026-00499|
Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Kapnick, Shulman, Michael, JJ.
Matthew Gaddy, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Saunders of counsel), for Justice Sara Litman, respondent.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Franklin R. Guenthner of counsel), for Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
M-00546 Matter of Gaddy v Litman
Motion for waiver of costs, fees and expenses, granted.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: May 19, 2026
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Matter of Gaddy v Litman
2026 NY Slip Op 03117
May 19, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
In re Matthew Gaddy, Petitioner,
v
Sara Litman, J.S.C., etc., et al., Respondents.
Decided and Entered: May 19, 2026
Appeal No. 6673, M-00546|Case No. 2026-00499|
Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Kapnick, Shulman, Michael, JJ.
Matthew Gaddy, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Saunders of counsel), for Justice Sara Litman, respondent.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Franklin R. Guenthner of counsel), for Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
M-00546 Matter of Gaddy v Litman
Motion for waiver of costs, fees and expenses, granted.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: May 19, 2026
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Matter of Gaddy v Litman
2026 NY Slip Op 03117
May 19, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
In re Matthew Gaddy, Petitioner,
v
Sara Litman, J.S.C., etc., et al., Respondents.
Decided and Entered: May 19, 2026
Appeal No. 6673, M-00546|Case No. 2026-00499|
Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Kapnick, Shulman, Michael, JJ.
Matthew Gaddy, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Saunders of counsel), for Justice Sara Litman, respondent.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Franklin R. Guenthner of counsel), for Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied
and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
M-00546 Matter of Gaddy v Litman
Motion for waiver of costs, fees and expenses, granted.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: May 19, 2026
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.