People v. Fuhrtz
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
People v Fuhrtz
2026 NY Slip Op 02934
May 12, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Christopher Fuhrtz, Appellant.
Decided and Entered: May 12, 2026
Ind. No. 70281/22, 135/21|Appeal No. 6593-6594|Case No. 2023-01663, 2023-01664, 2025-03063|
Before: Scarpulla, J.P., Mendez, Shulman, Rodriguez, Hagler, JJ.
Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Davin J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Andrew Kim of counsel), for respondent.
Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Brendan Lantry, J.), rendered February 17, 2023,
Said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: May 12, 2026
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
People v Fuhrtz
2026 NY Slip Op 02934
May 12, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Christopher Fuhrtz, Appellant.
Decided and Entered: May 12, 2026
Ind. No. 70281/22, 135/21|Appeal No. 6593-6594|Case No. 2023-01663, 2023-01664, 2025-03063|
Before: Scarpulla, J.P., Mendez, Shulman, Rodriguez, Hagler, JJ.
Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Davin J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Andrew Kim of counsel), for respondent.
Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Brendan Lantry, J.), rendered February 17, 2023,
Said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: May 12, 2026
Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
People v Fuhrtz
2026 NY Slip Op 02934
May 12, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Christopher Fuhrtz, Appellant.
Decided and Entered: May 12, 2026
Ind. No. 70281/22, 135/21|Appeal No. 6593-6594|Case No. 2023-01663, 2023-01664, 2025-03063|
Before: Scarpulla, J.P., Mendez, Shulman, Rodriguez, Hagler, JJ.
Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Davin J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Andrew Kim of counsel), for respondent.
Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Brendan Lantry, J.), rendered February 17, 2023,
Said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: May 12, 2026
Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
People v Fuhrtz
2026 NY Slip Op 02934
May 12, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Christopher Fuhrtz, Appellant.
Decided and Entered: May 12, 2026
Ind. No. 70281/22, 135/21|Appeal No. 6593-6594|Case No. 2023-01663, 2023-01664, 2025-03063|
Before: Scarpulla, J.P., Mendez, Shulman, Rodriguez, Hagler, JJ.
Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Davin J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Andrew Kim of counsel), for respondent.
Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Brendan Lantry, J.), rendered February 17, 2023,
Said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgments appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: May 12, 2026
Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.