Heitman Credit Acquisition XXIII, LLC v. Meadow Partners LLC
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Heitman Credit Acquisition XXIII, LLC v Meadow Partners LLC
2026 NY Slip Op 02923
May 12, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Heitman Credit Acquisition XXIII, LLC, Respondent,
v
Meadow Partners LLC, et al., Appellants.
Decided and Entered: May 12, 2026
Index No. 659052/24|Appeal No. 6571|Case No. 2025-07120|
Before: Renwick, P.J., Friedman, Kapnick, Pitt-Burke, O'neill Levy, JJ.
Cole Schotz P.C., New York (Arnold P. Picinich of counsel), for appellants.
Arnold and Porter Kaye Scholer LLC, New York (Eric N. Whitney of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa A. Crane, J.), entered October 28, 2025, which denied defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(4) and (7) to dismiss the amended complaint's remaining cause of action alleging breach of contract predicated on an alter ego theory, or, in the alternative, for a stay of the action pursuant to CPLR 2201 and 3211 (a)(4), unanimously modified, to the extent of granting a stay of this action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(4) pending a resolution of the
related action entitled Stier 109 LLC, et al. v 109 South 5 Property LLC, et al., index No. 653204/2022, pending before another Justice in Supreme Court, New York County, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
In view of the foregoing, we decline to address the merits of this appeal.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: May 12, 2026
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Heitman Credit Acquisition XXIII, LLC v Meadow Partners LLC
2026 NY Slip Op 02923
May 12, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Heitman Credit Acquisition XXIII, LLC, Respondent,
v
Meadow Partners LLC, et al., Appellants.
Decided and Entered: May 12, 2026
Index No. 659052/24|Appeal No. 6571|Case No. 2025-07120|
Before: Renwick, P.J., Friedman, Kapnick, Pitt-Burke, O'Neill Levy, JJ.
Cole Schotz P.C., New York (Arnold P. Picinich of counsel), for appellants.
Arnold and Porter Kaye Scholer LLC, New York (Eric N. Whitney of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa A. Crane, J.), entered October 28, 2025, which denied defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(4) and (7) to dismiss the amended complaint's remaining cause of action alleging breach of contract predicated on an alter ego theory, or, in the alternative, for a stay of the action pursuant to CPLR 2201 and 3211 (a)(4), unanimously modified, to the extent of granting a stay of this action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(4) pending a resolution of the
related action entitled Stier 109 LLC, et al. v 109 South 5 Property LLC, et al., index No. 653204/2022, pending before another Justice in Supreme Court, New York County, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
In view of the foregoing, we decline to address the merits of this appeal.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: May 12, 2026
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Heitman Credit Acquisition XXIII, LLC v Meadow Partners LLC
2026 NY Slip Op 02923
May 12, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Heitman Credit Acquisition XXIII, LLC, Respondent,
v
Meadow Partners LLC, et al., Appellants.
Decided and Entered: May 12, 2026
Index No. 659052/24|Appeal No. 6571|Case No. 2025-07120|
Before: Renwick, P.J., Friedman, Kapnick, Pitt-Burke, O'Neill Levy, JJ.
Cole Schotz P.C., New York (Arnold P. Picinich of counsel), for appellants.
Arnold and Porter Kaye Scholer LLC, New York (Eric N. Whitney of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa A. Crane, J.), entered October 28, 2025, which denied defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(4) and (7) to dismiss the amended complaint's remaining cause of action alleging breach of contract predicated on an alter ego theory, or, in the alternative, for a stay of the action pursuant to CPLR 2201 and 3211 (a)(4), unanimously modified, to the extent of granting a stay of this action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(4) pending a resolution of the
related action entitled Stier 109 LLC, et al. v 109 South 5 Property LLC, et al., index No. 653204/2022, pending before another Justice in Supreme Court, New York County, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
In view of the foregoing, we decline to address the merits of this appeal.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: May 12, 2026
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Heitman Credit Acquisition XXIII, LLC v Meadow Partners LLC
2026 NY Slip Op 02923
May 12, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Heitman Credit Acquisition XXIII, LLC, Respondent,
v
Meadow Partners LLC, et al., Appellants.
Decided and Entered: May 12, 2026
Index No. 659052/24|Appeal No. 6571|Case No. 2025-07120|
Before: Renwick, P.J., Friedman, Kapnick, Pitt-Burke, O'Neill Levy, JJ.
Cole Schotz P.C., New York (Arnold P. Picinich of counsel), for appellants.
Arnold and Porter Kaye Scholer LLC, New York (Eric N. Whitney of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa A. Crane, J.), entered October 28, 2025, which denied defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(4) and (7) to dismiss the amended complaint's remaining cause of action alleging breach of contract predicated on an alter ego theory, or, in the alternative, for a stay of the action pursuant to CPLR 2201 and 3211 (a)(4), unanimously modified, to the extent of granting a stay of this action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(4) pending a resolution of the
related action entitled Stier 109 LLC, et al. v 109 South 5 Property LLC, et al., index No. 653204/2022, pending before another Justice in Supreme Court, New York County, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
In view of the foregoing, we decline to address the merits of this appeal.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: May 12, 2026
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.