Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026

People v. Lucas

People v. Lucas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 28, 2026
2026 NY Slip Op 03336
People v. Lucas

Opinion

People v Lucas - 2026 NY Slip Op 03336
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

People v Lucas

2026 NY Slip Op 03336

May 28, 2026

Appellate Division, Third Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Ronald Lucas, Appellant.

Decided and Entered:May 28, 2026

CR-24-1096

Calendar Date: April 30, 2026

Before: Pritzker, J.P., Ceresia, Fisher, Mcshan And Corcoran, JJ.

Yorden C. Huban, Public Defender, Albany (James A. Bartosik Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Lee C. Kindlon, District Attorney, Albany (Emily Schultz of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

Pritzker, J.P.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Thomas Marcelle, J.), rendered January 18, 2024 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sexual act in the first degree.

Defendant was charged in an indictment with three counts of predatory sexual assault against a child, criminal sexual act in the first degree and attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree. After defendant's motion to suppress certain evidence was denied, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sexual act in the first degree. The plea agreement required defendant to waive his right to appeal. Supreme Court thereafter sentenced defendant to 6½ years in prison, to be followed by 20 years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

We affirm. Defendant's challenge to the denial of his suppression motion is precluded by his unchallenged appeal waiver (see People v Hughes, 243 AD3d 1081, 1081 [3d Dept 2025], lv denied 45 NY3d 946 [2026]; People v Nack, 200 AD3d 1197, 1199 [3d Dept 2021], lv denied 38 NY3d 1009 [2022]). Defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his plea survives the appeal waiver but is unpreserved for our review in the absence of an appropriate postallocution motion, and there is no basis in the record warranting the application of the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v Fernandez, 234 AD3d 1207, 1208 [3d Dept 2025], lv denied 43 NY3d 1008 [2025]; People v Werner, 227 AD3d 1273, 1273 [3d Dept 2024]).

Ceresia, Fisher, McShan and Corcoran, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.