Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026

Matter of Lubrano v. Bourne-Clarke

Matter of Lubrano v. Bourne-Clarke
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 17, 2026
2026 NY Slip Op 03806
Matter of Lubrano v. Bourne-Clarke

Opinion

Matter of Lubrano v Bourne-Clarke - 2026 NY Slip Op 03806
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Matter of Lubrano v Bourne-Clarke

2026 NY Slip Op 03806

June 17, 2026

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

In the Matter of Giuseppe Lubrano, petitioner,

v

Sharon A. Bourne-Clarke, etc., et al., respondents.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Decided on June 17, 2026

2026-02132 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P.

William G. Ford

Susan Quirk

Lisa S. Ottley, JJ.

Giuseppe Lubrano, Brooklyn, NY, petitioner pro se.

[*1]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in effect, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Sharon A. Bourne-Clarke, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to issue an order transferring all proceedings in a proceeding entitled Matter of Lubrano v Bourne-Clarke, pending in that court under Index No. 520176/25, to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804(g), and application by the petitioner for a waiver of costs, fees, and expenses.

ORDERED that the application for a waiver of costs, fees, and expenses is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

CHAMBERS, J.P., FORD, QUIRK and OTTLEY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.